The Horrifying Origins of the "Sexual Revolution"

The Modern-Day Lysenkos - John Money and Alfred Kinsey

America’s “Progressives” (they are not “progressive at all - they are regressive) are highly ignorant of the twisted and sick origins of current sex ideology - in particular the transgender insanity consuming our world. The “father” of the movement was a 20th Century Dr. Frankenstein - Dr. John Money (1921-2006).

He was no doctor.

He was a monster.

Money was a psychologist and sexologist. In 1955, he was the first person to use the term “gender” rather than sex. The term “gender identity” came from him. He is the true father of the current “trans movement.”

He subsequently popularised terms like ‘gender identity’ and even founded the world’s first gender-identity clinic at John Hopkins University in Baltimore in the US in 1966, specialising in the psychological and medical treatment of transgender patients. Above all, Money pushed the view, so central to today’s trans movement, that though we may be born with biologically determined sex characteristics, they do not determine whether we are male or female. Without Money, it’s unlikely that trans ideology, especially the phenomenon of ‘trans kids’, would exist today in the way that it does.¹

The Sad Tale of David Reimer

In 1965, two little twin boys were born to the Reimer family - Brian and Bruce Reimer. Tragedy, however, struck the joyous occasion of their infanthood when, at 8 months old, Bruce (David) suffered a botched circumcision which resulted in the loss of his penis. The Reimers went to doctor after doctor. No reconstructive surgery was possible at that time. The doctors gave them the horrific news that little Bruce would have a tragic life - never to enjoy sex or father children with a wife.

The hopeless and despondent parents were left feeling guilty and heartbroken.

Until, one fateful evening in December of 1966, the parents saw a television ad featuring Dr. Money boasting of his gender work at the Baltimore John Hopkins University. He claimed that a man could become a woman.

With nowhere else to turn, they ensnared themselves in the spider’s web.

They reached out to Money who promptly returned their inquiry. Money was overjoyed - he had the perfect specimen to test his gender theories on - little Bruce Reimer.

And his twin brother Brian would serve as a perfect “control” to his experiments.

When they visited Money, he urged them to immediately perform a surgery on Bruce to remove his testicles and construct an artificial vagina. The parents were hesitant.

But Money would not take “no” for answer. He demanded a “yes” and he demanded it now! The parents wanted to move slowly. Money became increasingly belligerent. The baby’s own pediatrician recommended against the surgery.² The parents agreed with their pediatrician.

Money was not to be deterred. He harangued the parents, pressuring them until they finally caved and passed their child through the fire to Molech. Little Bruce - Brenda, as he would now be called - was passed into Money’s Molechian hands.

The first thing Money did was to surgically castrate the now 17-month old child and to begin construction on an artificial female genitalia. He then ordered the parents to raise Bruce as a girl - “Brenda."

As the years passed, Bruce’s maleness began to manifest. He wanted to shave like his Daddy.³ When he got a girl’s jumprope, he and his brother used it to play cowboys.⁴ He didn’t want to play with girl toys - he wanted to build forts and play army with other little boys.⁵ He got picked on in school - forced to be a “girl” the other students (genuinely believing he was a girl) picked on him for being a “tomboy” due to his interest in boy toys and activities.⁶ His parents were ordered by Money to continue reinforcing female toys and activities - to shame him when he acted like a “boy” but praise him when he acted like a “girl.”

Money was interested in his own self-aggrandizement, not in Bruce’s wellbeing. In December of 1972, Money presented his “twin case” at a meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Washington, D.C. Time Magazine ran a full-time story on the study, which coincided with Money’s release of a book about Bruce titled “Man Woman, Boy Girl.” Of course, Money self-praised himself that the entire experiment was a resounding success!⁷ Well sure - if you completely ignore Bruce’s feelings and traumas!

But the study helped fuel the Leftist craze towards the modern gender insanity of today:

"This dramatic case," Time duly reported in its Jan. 8, 1973, edition, "provides strong support for a major contention of women's liberationists: that conventional patterns of masculine and feminine behavior can be altered. It also casts doubt on the theory that major sexual differences, psychological as well as anatomical, are immutably set by the genes at conception." The New York Times Book Reviewhailed Man Woman Boy Girl as "the most important volume in the social sciences to appear since the Kinsey reports" and praised Money for producing "real answers to that ancient question: Is it heredity or environment?" But it was on the pediatric wards of hospitals around the world that the twins case would have its most lasting impact.

"It was the hallmark case," says Dr. William Reiner a child psychologist at Johns Hopkins. "It was the hallmark because it was followed and written up a number of times by Money and then essentially was the source of his statements - and subsequent statements in any of the pediatric textbooks in endocrinology, urology, surgery and psychology - that you can reassign the sex of a child because it's the social situation that is the most important." The undisputed success of the twins case legitimized the practice of infant sex reassignment globally, says Reiner. Once confined principally to Johns Hopkins, the procedure soon spread and today is performed in virtually every major country, with the possible exception of China and India. While no annual tally of infant sex reassignments has ever been made, Reiner makes a rough, "conservative" estimate that three to five cases crop up in every major American city each year - giving the U.S. alone a total of 100 to 200 sex reassignments a year. Globally, he puts the figure at perhaps 1,000 per year. In the 25 years since Money's twins case was first published, as many as 15,000 similar sex reassignments may have been performed.⁸

Scientists that had a conscience (and a firm grip on reality) had a different view of Money’s research - they were “less than enthusiastic.” Money simply discounted them as hateful bigots who were “instrumental in wrecking the lives of unknown numbers of hermaphroditic youngsters."⁹

Meanwhile, Bruce (Brenda) continued to resist efforts to raise him as a girl:

Brenda Reimer resisted being classified as a girl from the beginning. The first time she wore a dress, she tried to rip it off. She preferred her brother's toys to her own. (A toy sewing machine was untouched, Colapinto writes, "until the day when Brenda, who loved to take things apart to see how they worked, sneaked a screwdriver from her dad's tool kit and dismantled the toy.") She got into fights, insisted on peeing standing up, and ran into terrible problems at school, where the other kids quickly recognized her as someone who didn't fit the ordinary sexual categories. By the time she was 10, she was declaring that she wanted to grow up to marry a woman, not a man.¹⁰

But that was not the end. Money insisted that he see Bruce once a year in Baltimore for “counseling” starting at the age of 6. His brother Brian was to come for counseling too as the “control.” What was to come was even more shocking and chilling.

The Sexual Abuse Starts

Both children were forced to have private sessions with Money. The brother, Brian (who was interviewed under the pseudonym of “Kevin” in his later years until the family gave permission to release their identities) discussed disturbing sexual abuse that escalated. Kevin (“Brian”) and Bruce (under the pseudonym “John” stated:

"Dr. Money would ask me, 'Do you ever dream of having sex with women?' " Kevin recalls. "He'd say, 'Do you ever get an erection?' And the same with Joan. 'Do you think about this? About that?' "

While attempting to probe the twins' sexual psyches, Money also tried his hand at programming Kevin's and Joan's respective sense of themselves as boy and girl. One of his theories of how children form their different "gender schemes" - Money's term - was that they must understand, at an early age, the differences between male and female sex organs. Pornography, he believed, was ideal for this purpose. "Explicit sexual pictures," he wrote in his book Sexual Signatures, "can and should be used as part of a child's sex education"; such pictures, he said, "reinforce his or her own gender identity and gender role."

"He would show us pictures of kids, boys and girls, with no clothes on," Kevin says. John recalls that Dr. Money also showed them pictures of adults engaged in sexual intercourse: "He'd say to us, 'I want to show you pictures of things that moms and dads do.' "¹¹

Money was a “doctor” alright - a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde! He showed two personalities. Like a true sociopath he was able to chameleon himself to the parents. When alone with the kids, the true Dr. Money came out.

During these visits, the twins discovered that Money had two sides to his personality. "One when mom and dad weren't around," Kevin says, "and another when they were." When their parents were present, they say, Money was avuncular, mild-spoken. But alone with the children, he could be irritable or worse. Especially when they defied him.¹²

Money forced the children to strip nude and inspect each other’s genitals. They were forced to do it in front of Money and several of his attendants. If they dared defy him, the monster bore its fangs.

"I remember getting yelled at by Money because I was defiant," John says. "He told me to take my clothes off, and I just did not do it. I just stood there. And he screamed, 'Now!' Louder than that. I thought he was going to give me a whupping. So I took my clothes off and stood there, shaking." In a separate conversation with me, Kevin recalls that same incident. " 'Take your clothes off - now!' " Kevin shouts.¹³

Bruce began resisting going to the annual sessions with Money. His parents (not knowing what was happening behind closed doors) tried to bribe him with trips to Disneyland if he would just obey.

At age 8, Money recommended Bruce complete the vaginal surgery. He told the parents that the reason Bruce was resisting being a girl was because his vagina was not complete. Once his genitalia fully matched a females he would completely embrace being a girl.

Yeah, didn’t happen.

Bruce was determined not to have the surgery. He finally realized he was not a girl, but a boy. He would scream and yell and run out of the room anytime the idea of the surgery was brought up. He tried to be brave and tell Money he didn’t want to do the surgery. Of course, Bruce’s wishes were not to be considered. He must go along with the experiment. His choice was non-existent as far as Money was concerned. What did Money do? Showed him more pornography!

She quietly told Dr. Money that she did not want to have the surgery. But the psychologist did not seem to want to hear this. Instead, Dr. Money would once again break out his cache of photographs of naked women. He would focus Joan's gaze on the labia, vulva, clitoris. "Can't you see that you're different?" he would say. "That's why you need the surgery."

Joan, frightened but adamant, would simply refuse to lift her eyes. "Don't you want to be a normal girl?" Dr. Money would ask repeatedly. "Don't you want to be a normal girl?"¹⁴

Not only this - Money intensified the sexual abuse:

In the children's grimmest recollection - one they found almost impossible to talk about years later - Money allegedly made "Brenda assume a position on all fours on his office sofa and make Brian come up behind her on his knees and place his crotch against her buttocks", an element of Money's theory he referred to as "sexual rehearsal play".¹⁵

Just whose sexual proclivities were being indulged here?

Fighting Back

Money also upped Bruce’s estrogen intake. He took him to meet a transsexual to talk with him and pressure him into going through with the surgery.¹⁶ And you wonder why the Left wants events like “Drag Queen Story Hour”?

Bruce did not take to that well. He ran from the transsexual, up the stairs to the roof of the hospital and threatened to commit suicide. After being coaxed down, he told his mother that if he were forced to see Dr. Money again, he really would kill himself.

But Money was not about to loose his prey so easily.

In 1979 he wrote to the parents that he would be in town and that it was imperative that he see the twins. Money said he “had to catch a flight” and it was urgent that they allow him access to their house immediately. The children hid in the basement. The parents noticed that, while he was there, he suddenly no longer seemed to be in a hurry and not at al worried about his flight. He announced to them that he had missed it and had nowhere to stay. Since the parents still believed in Dr. Money, they agreed to let him spend the night. The children only emerged from the basement for dinner, spoke only a little to Money, then retreated back to the safety of the basement.

That was the last time they ever saw Money (good riddance!).

As puberty set in, Bruce stopped taking estrogen and embraced his maleness (Yes Libs - his “toxic masculinity”). His treatment was taken over by other endocrinologists and psychiatrists who finally wavered in their faith in Money, before relenting and ending the treatment. As he matured, his parents finally told him the truth - he was born a boy and was damaged during a botched circumcision.

Bruce changed his name to David, had an operation to reconstruct his male genitalia, got married, adopted his wife’s kids and lived as a father.

A Tragic End

David, however, would continue to suffer from the emotional traumas inflicted on him by Money for the rest of his life. He lost his job, a big investment turned into a bust and his marriage ended. His brother Brian ended up passing away. The weight of all this, plus the traumas of Money, caused him to finally end his own life.

Before he died, Money was interviewed by John Calapinto. Money maintained his delusionary megalomania until the bitter end. Calapinto writes: “I reminded Money that his book Man Woman, Boy Girl is still in print and that it reports the John/Joan case as a success. Asked if it would not be worthwhile for him to make changes in the text for a future edition, Money said flatly, "I'll be dead by then."¹⁷

Indeed, Money did die. In 2006, he went to his eternal reward.

The Brutalization of Children Continues

Lauren Smith, contributor for Spike, writes:

There’s little doubt today that Money’s experiment was a callous failure. The lives of Reimer, his brother and his parents were sacrificed at the altar of an early form of gender ideology. Yet, even now, too many have failed to learn the lessons of this tragedy. Institutions, from schools to healthcare, still happily promote the ideas of gender identity and genderfluidity. Many politicians still treat trans ideology as if it is a ‘progressive’ cause that only uncaring bigots would oppose. And children are still being used by gender ideologues as fodder for trans experimentation.¹⁸

Indeed, Money and his confederates remained a source of income in grants to the Kinsey Institute which has a laudatory article about him on their website.¹⁹

Who was Alfred Kinsey?

Another twisted pervert.

Dr. Judith Reisman delved deep into Kinsey’s sex research which began after World War II. Dr. Reisman has been smeared and slandered on all fronts for daring to have the temerity to go after one of the darlings of the Left’s Sexual Revolution. The Kinsey Institute sued her for libel - and lost!

Kinsey may have been even more twisted than Money. He believed that infants could achieve sexual orgasm! You read that correctly - infants.

In his infamous Table 34 of his famous book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, he includes the following table:

You are not hallucinating. Kinsey published a table where he researched “orgasms” in children from 5 months to 10 years!

The Kinsey Institute has tried to deflect from this. They claim that he did not experiment on any actual infants. But that is beside the point! Whether infants were actually involved or not is immaterial! Kinsey believed that infants could manifest orgasms. He interrogated parents about their children’s sexual reactions to certain stimuli which is how he claimed he got his data.

Whether Kinsey actually experimented on children is beside the point. The fact that he believed children are sexual and that they can (even infants!) experience an orgasm is grotesque! To even think that (much less publish it) is horrific! It is the result of a twisted sociopath fully given over to a dark and reprobate mind (Romans 1:18-32).

The modern Leftist views on sexuality were influenced by Kinsey. The trans cult is influenced by Money. Kinsey wanted a sexually liberated America and has he ever gotten his wish (though right now he probably wishes for a drop of cold water to cool his tongue). His perverted Kinsey Scale claims that humans exist on a “spectrum” of sexuality and that everybody is a “little bit” gay.

Who funded Kinsey’s research? Why - none other than the Rockefeller Foundation!²⁰ With grants from the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey published the aforementioned Sexual Behavior in the Human Male in 1948. “The book’s revolutionary assertion was that sexual diversity was normal. Most famously, Kinsey argued that human sexuality could be mapped onto a continuum from heterosexual to homosexual, rather than fitting only into one of those two simple categories.”²¹

A Larger Conspiracy

Why would the Rockefeller Foundation fund Kinsey’s work? Because the Rockefeller Foundation had a larger goal in mind - to subvert society’s mores to make the masses easier to control. The Rockefeller Foundation is one of many financial tentacles of the global elite to usher in the New World Order under the rule of a Satan-possessed antichrist.

What role then does sexual perversity play in this greater agenda?

New World Order researcher Henry Makes quotes Sociologist Erica Carle who states that “Sex is the ultimate weapon in people-taming and people control.”²² When sex becomes the dominant feature of the mind (and collectively society), it results in mental incapacitation; it destroys ones personal identity, individuality, family life and maternal/paternal feelings. “All else can be forgotten when the mind is captured by the dominant idea of sex.”²³

Dr. Judith Reisman’s exposure of pornography and its impact on the brain proves precisely this. See her website and published books for more information. Below I have included several lectures and interviews with her. Tragically, Dr. Reisman passed away circa 2021. However, her bravery in the face of the monolithic Kinsey Sex Cult should continue to be lauded.

David Rockefeller, the chairman and chief executive of Chase Manhattan Corporation, has admitted to his role in helping along the march to world government. Among his other positions, David Rockefeller is the founder of the Trilateral Commission and Chairman of the subversive Council on Foreign Relations. Furthermore, David Rockefeller is also a member of the infamous and secretive Bilderberg Club (a.k.a. the “Bilderbergers”). The Bilderbergers are a club of international bankers, politicians, media personalities, industrialists, academia etc., who meet annually in a clandestine setting.

The existence of the Bilderberg Group and their annual meetings are admitted to by the Bilderbergers themselves. They have their own official website, the URL of which is: www.bilderbergmeetings.org/index.php. On the home page of their website, they proudly state:

Fouded in 1954, Bilderberg is an annual conference designed to foster dialogue between Europe and North America. Every year, between 120-150 political leaders and experts from industry, finance, academia and the media are invited to take part in the conference. About two thirds of the participants come from Europe and the rest from North America; one third from politics and government and the rest from other fields.

The conference is a forum for informal discussions about megatrends and major issues facing the world. The meetings are held under the Chatham House Rule, which states that participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s) nor of any other participant may be revealed.

Thanks to the private nature of the conference, the participants are not bound by the conventions of their office or by pre-agreed positions. As such, they can take time to listen, reflect and gather insights.

There is no detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.²⁴

The Bilderberg Group ends their statement by telling us that there is no “detailed agenda, no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, and no policy statements are issued.” That statement is made to make the Bilderberger meetings seem innocuous enough. That is to say, they are trying to make it seem as though there is nothing sinister at all about their secret meetings. That seems well enough, until one thinks critically about it. Why meet at all if no resolutions are proposed, no votes are taken, there is no detailed agenda, and no policy statements are issued?

            On April 11, 1964, Senator Jacob Javitts, a member of the Bilderberg Group, issued a statement in the Congressional Record: “Bilderberg is in no sense a policy-making body. No conclusions are reached. There is no voting and no resolutions are passed.”²⁵ That begs the question, what then is the purpose of their meeting? The famed British authority on international power politics, A. K. Chesterton answers that question:

If the Bilderberg Group conferences reach no conclusions and recommend no policies, it is because the conclusions have already been reached and the policies determined, so that the delegates assemble to be told what the form is. They did not need to be given their orders. Once the form is declared they know well enough what is expected of them, while for our part it can be affirmed with assurance that the Bilderberg ‘power elite’ would not discuss the nuclear power deterrence of the North Atlantic Treaty Alliance in a sense favorable to countries such as Great Britain retaining nuclear weapons under their own sovereign control.”²⁶

The annual Bilderberg meetings are held with the highest security, including over 1,000 security guards. Not only that, when the Bilderberg meetings are held, the nearby residents must leave the area while the meetings are in session. Additionally, the regular staff members of whichever hotel the meetings are held in (many times they have been held in the Woodstock Inn in Vermont) the staff of the hotel in question is temporarily suspended and replaced with new staff who do not speak English.²⁷

During the Bilderberg meeting of June 5-9, 1991, David Rockefeller opened the speech thusly:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years …

***

It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government which will never again know war but only peace and prosperity for the whole of humanity. The supranational sovereignty of the intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national autodetermination practiced in the past centuries.²⁸

David Rockefeller has not only admitted to his role in the march towards world government at Bilderberger meetings. He has done so publicly as well! In his 2002 Memoirs, David Rockefeller said:

For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American politics and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and am proud of it.^[i]

There you have it! David Rockefeller, member of the Bilderbergers, member of the Trilateral Commission, member of the Council on Foreign Relations, is proud to admit that he is helping work towards a one world government.²⁹

The funding of Kinsey helped anesthetize the American people. Our society has been deliberately dumbed down through bombarding their brain with serotonin levels. The more perverse the sex, the better to dumb society down and control them. As Edmund Burke once said:

Men are qualified for civil liberty in exact proportion to their disposition to put moral chains upon their own appetites, — in proportion as their love to justice is above their rapacity,—in proportion as their soundness and sobriety of understanding is above their vanity and presumption,—in proportion as they are more disposed to listen to the counsels of the wise and good, in preference to the flattery of knaves. Society cannot exist, unless a controlling power upon will and appetite be placed somewhere; and the less of it there is within, the more there must be without. It is ordained in the eternal constitution of things, that men of intemperate minds cannot be free. Their passions forge their fetters.³⁰

Truly the Bible is correct when it states that those given over to sexual depravity are also given over to dark, reprobate and dumbed-down minds (Romans 1:18-32).

Below are several videos from Dr. Judith Reisman exposing Kinsey, the Sexual Revolution and the harmful impact of pornography on the brain:

1. Lauren Smith, “Dr John Money and the sinister origins of gender ideology”, February 5th, 2023, https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/05/dr-john-money-and-the-sinister-origins-of-gender-ideology/

2. John Calapinto, “The True Story of John/Joan”, The Rolling Stone, December 11, 1997, pages 54-97, available at https://www.healthyplace.com/gender/inside-intersexuality/the-true-story-of-john-joan

3. Op. cit.

4. Op. cit.

5. Op. cit.

6. Op. cit.

7. Op. cit.

8. Op. cit.

9. Jesse Walker, “The Death of David Reimer,” Reason, May 24, 2004, at https://reason.com/2004/05/24/the-death-of-david-reimer/

10. Op. cit.

11. John Calapinto, “The True Story of John/Joan”, The Rolling Stone, December 11, 1997, pages 54-97, available at https://www.healthyplace.com/gender/inside-intersexuality/the-true-story-of-john-joan

12. Op. cit.

13. Op. cit.

14. Op. cit.

15. Oliver Burkeman and Gary Younge, “Being Brenda,” The Guardian, May 12, 2004, at https://www.theguardian.com/books/2004/may/12/scienceandnature.gender

16. John Calapinto, “The True Story of John/Joan,” The Rolling Stone, December 11, 1007, pages 54-97, available at https://www.healthyplace.com/gender/inside-intersexuality/the-true-story-of-john-joan

17. Op. cit.

18. Lauren Smith, “Dr John Money and the sinister origins of gender ideology,” February 5th, 2023, https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/02/05/dr-john-money-and-the-sinister-origins-of-gender-ideology/

19. https://kinseyinstitute.org/collections/archival/john-money.php

20. Rachel Wimpee and Teresa Iacobelli, “Funding a Sexual Revolution: The Kinsey Reports”, RE:Source, January 9, 2020, at https://resource.rockarch.org/story/funding-a-sexual-revolution-the-kinsey-reports/

21. Op. cit.

22. Henry Makow, Illuminati 2: Deceit and Seduction, p. 20, 2010.

23. Op. cit.

24. The Bilderberg Group Official Website, www.bilderbergmeetings.org/index.php

25. Senator Jacob Javitts, United States Congressional Record, https://archive.org/stream/congressrecindex110unit/congressrecindex110unit_djvu.txt, quoted April 11, 1964

26. Des Griffen, Fourth Reich of the Rich, p. 128, Emissary Publications, 1976, (quoting A. K. Chesterton, The Unhappy Lords, pp. 205-206).

27. Op. cit. at p. 129.

28. Des Griffen, Fourth Reich of the Rich, p. 130, Emissary Publications, 1976 (quoting from Lectures Francaises, July-August, 1991, by Hilaire Du Berrier Reports, 20 Boulevard Princess Charlotte, Monte Carlo, Monaco, September, 1991) (italics Griffen’s).

29. David Rockefeller, Memoirs, p. 405, Random House; 1^st Trade Ed edition, 2002.

30. https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/293641-men-are-qualified-for-civil-liberty-in-exact-proportion-to