Heliocentricity is the Foundation of Scientism

In 2014, Robert Sungenis released a documentary called The Principle which asserts that the Earth is unique and is at the center of the universe.¹ A geocentric model of the universe points to the Earth as special. It points to man as God’s unique creation and all of the universe as a testament to His glory and power.

Most would dismiss the idea of geocentrism out of hand. They are convinced that the Copernican, heliocentric model has been absolutely proven as fact. They dismiss anyone who questions it as “crazy”, “stupid”, “ignorant” etc. “He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him” (Proverbs 18:13).

The “Flat Earth” Movement Is (For the Most Part) Controlled Opposition

First, let me say that I am not a flat earther. Without intending any offense to my flat earth brethren, I do believe that the flat earth movement was released as controlled opposition to discredit the growing awareness of those in the scientific community of the flaws in the Copernican, heliocentric model. Many within the scientific community have been accepting a geocentric model of the universe and are moving away from the random chance, Big Bang cosmology with the earth flung into a far distant corner of the universe.

The documentary The Principle showed a lot of scientists (Scientism) such as Lawrence Krauss and Michio Kaku admitting there are flaws in the Copernican model. The powers that be had to jump into damage control. Heliocentrism (sun at the center of a solar system - aka sun worship) is the foundation for most of Scientism’s dogmas such as the Big Bang Theory, a 15 billion year-old universe and evolution. Without heliocentrism, these other dogmas cannot stand. A geocentric universe would point to a Creator. The Copernican model was developed in order to deliberately conceal the existence of the Creator. Satan cannot allow people to start to question Copernicanism. Then they might question evolution and begin to wonder if there is, in fact, a God.

Enter the flat earth movement around 2015 to 2016, shortly after The Principle documentary was released. Eric Dubay appears to be the one who incited the explosion of the flat earth movement with his series of YouTube videos and his book The Flat Earth Conspiracy. A reading of his book and some research shows that Dubay does not point people to the true Creator, Jesus Christ. Instead, Dubay points people to the New Age Movement.

The fact that the flat earth movement was allowed to move into the mainstream gives one pause to wonder: why? Scientism is all too happy to allow the flat earth movement to reign as the sole alternative to heliocentrism. That way they can frame the debate between heliocentrism or flat earth as the only two positions.

By framing the debate in this way, Scientism puts people into one of two categories. Most people will dismiss the flat earth model; that therefore leaves only the heliocentric model as the alternative.

But there is another model - one that fits the facts and our own observations just as well as the heliocentric model. This is a model that the high priests of Scientism and their paymasters want the masses ignorant of.

That model is the Tychonian Geocentric Globe Model.

Tycho Brahe’s Model of Geocentrism

Most people dismiss the geocentric model because they believe it simply swaps the positions of the sun and moon - a stationary earth with all the planets and sun going around it.

The reality is Tycho Brahe (1546-1601) developed a highly accurate model that even is used by NASA to this day. Most astronomers and cosmologists are still impressed by Brahe’s model. Brahe so accurately mapped the positions of the planets, sun and moon that he is still highly regarded. Even most scientists today are forced to admit that he was one of the most brilliant astronomers to ever live.

Brahe’s geocentric model perfectly fits our observations - this is admitted to even by scientists within NASA!

Brahe’s model puts the earth in the center of our solar system with the sun rotating around it. However, his model does not have the planets traveling around the earth as well. Instead, the other planets rotate around the sun as it moves along its elliptical around the Earth. This model allows for the different positions of the planets and stars during different seasons - exactly as we see it! It allows for the geometry and distances cited by Copernicus and allows the retrograde motion of the planets as well as explaining parallax as the stars are also moving relative to the earth.

In addition, as the sun rotates around the earth, it rotates in a helix. Think of an upward spiral. The sun rotates upwards in a spiral until it reaches its apex. Then its daily rotation begins in a downward motion. This accounts for the change in the seasons.

Below is a picture of the Tychonian model of our solar system:

The Tychonian model shows the earth at the center of our galaxy (shaded in blue). The sun rotates around the earth and the planets rotate around the sun (the sun and planets are shaded in yellow). This allows also for the phases of the moon as it goes around the earth - a difficulty to reconcile under the flat earth model. Brahe’s model - despite being rejected by the forces of Scientism - is highly accurate. His measurements are admitted to be precise. Even Scientism’s front organizations such as NASA grudgingly agree.

For example, NASA has a website featuring “Astronomers of the Day.” They allowed their editors to state “Tycho Brahe thus compiled tables of precise measurements of the positions and brightness of planets and stars.”²

As a startling matter of fact: Brahe’s model has never been disproven!³ Not only has it never been disproven, it is the model currently assumed in all applied sciences today - including practical astronomy, space travel and eclipse predictions!⁴

Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D. writes:

… Again, once more for the record: it has been shown at least six different ways this century alone that the equations and physics used by NASA to launch satellites are identical to the equations derived from a geocentric universe. Thus, if the space program is proof of anything, it proves geocentricity and disproves heliocentrism!⁵

What about gravity? Under the Tychonian model, it is the sun rotating around the earth and all of the planets in turn rotate around the sun. If the earth is the center of gravity, the solar system would function as a giant gravitron. The earth, at the center of the solar system, functions as the center of gravity with all planetary bodies rotating around it.

What kind of illustration can be used? Imagine taking a tennis racket by its handle and hurling it with all your might. The racket will spin as it flies through the air - the very bottom of its handle would function as the center of gravity. The handle will fly through the air, but stay in place. The heavier round portion (used to hit balls) will rotate around the bottom of the handle which functions as the center of gravity.

Quasars Prove Geocentrism

In 1976, V.P. Varshni studied the distribution of quasars. His findings were published in The Astrophysics and Space Science Journal. According to Varshni: “the cosmological interpretation for the red shift in the spectra of quasars leads to yet another paradoxical result: namely, that the earth is the center of the Universe.”⁶

Most scientists accept the redshift hypothesis for quasars as factual. If it is true, then Varshni concludes:

the Earth is indeed the center of the Universe. The arrangement of quasars on certain spherical shells is only with respect to the Earth. These shells would disappear if viewed from another galaxy or quasar. This means that the cosmological principle will have to go. Also it implies that a coordinate system fixed to the Earth will be a preferred frame of reference in the Universe. Consequently, both the Special and General Theory of Relativity must be abandoned for cosmological purposes.⁷

According to Varshni’s calculations, the odds against the arrangement of quasars being accidental are 3 × 10 to the 86th power squared to one.⁸ The odds are too high for them to exist that way by chance! There has to be a God!

Enter Kepler

During the last year of Brahe’s life, Johannes Kepler became his personal assistant. It must be noted that Brahe was resisting the growing Copernican, heliocentric theory. His studies were based on observations - not theoretical mathematics! Once he died, all of his materials, studies, journals, observations - a treasure trove of observational, empirical data - fell into the hands of Kepler.

It must be understood that Kepler was a devoted Copernican. The two worked together in Brahe’s last year - however, Brahe pleaded with Kepler on his deathbed to not use his work to support Copernicanism.⁹

The fact that Brahe pled with Kepler to not use his work for the cause of Copernicus is an important fact. It indicates that the two had debated heliocentrism vs. geocentrism during that last year. Otherwise, how would Brahe know Kepler was a Copernican and why would he plead with him on his deathbed? Obviously the debate between the two was a contentious one.

Brahe of course died and Kepler immediately seized all of his works. Of course, he used them to support Copernicanism against the wishes of Brahe.

The death of Brahe was very sudden. He was only 54 years old. The cause of death for a long time was a mystery. That is, until 1991 when a high level of mercury was found in his body during the last week of his life.¹⁰

Did Johannes Kepler murder Tycho Brahe to get his data?

The verdict is still out on that one!

What few realize is that Kepler, not Newton, was the first to theorize the Universal Gravitation concept.¹¹ He is mainly credited with discovering elliptical orbits.¹² However, that does not disprove the geocentric model - the planets have elliptical orbits around the sun just exactly as they do under the heliocentric model! Kepler never proved heliocentrism - his hypothesis was accepted by bare, blanket assertion. His theories work just as well under Brahe’s geocentric model!

What About the Bible?

The Genesis account has God creating the universe in six literal days and resting on the seventh. The Book of Hebrews ties the finished atoning work of Christ on the cross with the finishing of God’s Creation. God rested on the seventh day. We rest in the finished work of Christ. We are saved by grace - not by our works. We rest from trying to work our way to Heaven by resting in the finished work of Christ. Only His blood can wash away our sins - not our works, not our own righteousness. Jesus alone is the Creator. No man created with Him. In the same way, Jesus alone is the Savior! We do not add our works to His salvation - He saved His elect by Himself (Romans 5, Hebrews 10:14).

If Creation is not complete, but ongoing, then salvation is not finished, but also ongoing. Then Christ’s work is not complete. His death on the cross was not the final sacrifice after all. It must be repeated. We must therefore continue Christ’s work by adding our works to His finished work.

The Big Bang Theory = synergistic, faith plus works salvation.

Finished Creation = monergistic, grace alone salvation

When does the Bible say God created the earth?

And God made two great lights; the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night: he made the stars also. And God set them in the firmament of the heaven to give light upon the earth, And to rule over the day and over the night, and to divide the light from the darkness: and God saw that it was good. And the evening and the morning were the fourth day (Genesis 1:16-19).

If the heliocentric model is the correct one, what was the earth rotating around on Days 1-3 since the sun wasn’t created until Day 4?

In the Book of Joshua, it says:

Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon: and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon. And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is this not written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day (Joshua 10:12-13).

Heliocentrism is the Foundation for all of Scientism’s Other Lies

Why is this important? What does it matter?

It matters because heliocentrism has an unspecial earth, flung into the far-corners of the universe. Once the earth is removed from the center of creation, then man is removed as God’s unique creation, made in His image. If there is nothing special about the earth, there is nothing special about man.

If geocentrism is true, it indicates an organized creation where all things were made for the glory of God. It indicates design. It indicates order. It points to a Creator. “The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork” (Psalm 19:1).

For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things (Romans 1:18-23).

Christian researcher and lawyer Edward Hendrie lays bare the importance of heliocentrism for Scientism’s other dogmas:

Heliocentrism is truly the mother of all conspiracies. None of the other Satan-inspired, manmade philosophies would ever dare be presented without the geocentric landmark first being removed by the general acceptance of heliocentrism. Heliocentrism is the keystone to the deception; remove that keystone, and the entire edifice of deception will fall. With that keystone in place, the satanic source of the deception is inscrutable, and the facade of scientific authority for the satanic philosophies remains believable.¹³

The random-chance, Big Bang Theory relies on the foundation of heliocentrism. Under the rubric of geocentrism, the Big Bang Theory would not pass muster. That is because the Big Bang is the result of a cosmic accident that flung all matter out into the universe. Nothing came from everything and was flung into existence. That origin model would not pass muster under geocentrism where everything is fine-tuned for the earth. Only by removing the earth from the universe’s center and flinging it into a far corner of the universe can the Big Bang Theory be plausible.

Without the Big Bang Theory, there is no evolution. And without evolution, there is no Freudian psychology or nominalism. With no Freudianism or nominalism, there is no liberalism. With no liberalism there is no socialism or communism. All of these philsophies stand on heliocentrism - and on atheism. God must be removed for any of these satanic philosophies to stand. They can only pass muster and be employed if godlessness reigns in both society and government.

Heliocentrism was the first step towards the new religion of Scientism.

The first, but not the last.

What else will Satan come up with and will it be a part of the strong delusion of 2 Thessalonians 2?

1. The Principle Movie, https://www.theprinciplemovie.com

2. Robert Nemirroff (MTU) & Jerry Bonnell (USRA), “Astronomy Picture of the Day: Tycho Brahe,” January 7, 2001, https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap010107.html

3. Marshall Hall, The Earth is Not Moving, p. 42, Fair Education Foundation, Inc. 2005.

4. Op. cit.

5. Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D., “News Extracts,” Bulletin of the Tychonian Society, Spring, 1990, Cleveland, Ohio, No. 53, p. 28.

6. Gerardus D. Bouw, Ph.D., Geocentricity: Christianity in the Woodshed, p. 548, DayStar Publishing, 2013.

7. Op. cit. at p. 550.

8. Op. cit.

9. Marshall Hall, The Earth is Not Moving, p. 47, Fair Education Foundation, Inc. 2005.

10. Dainel Mallia, Did Johannes Kepler Murder Tycho Brahe?, January 2012, https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/144040

11. Marshall Hall, The Earth is Not Moving, p. 61, Fair Education Foundation, Inc. 2005.

12. Op. cit.

13. Edward Hendrie, The Greatest Lie on Earth: Proof Our World Is Not a Moving Globe, p. 31-32, Great Mountain Publishing, 2018.